The Mueller Live

Live Updates On Donald J. Trump Federal Special Counsel Investigation


Has anyone written a direct response to Jackson Lears’s Russiagate article?

I was surprised to read this piece in the London Review of Books from last year dismissing the basic idea that Russia had interfered in the 2016 US election.

Lears wrote a followup a couple months later:

They’re both astonishingly dishonest and distorted. He makes unsupported assumptions while ignoring basic facts.

I was surprised because I found the article through the Twitter feed of Daniel Dennett, a philosopher for whom I have a lot of respect. He wrote: “This is required reading. Very unsettling, worth exploring further.”

I could go through both articles point-by-point (for example, there’s strong evidence for Russian attacks on both American and European elections), but I’m curious whether this has already been done. Anybody?

Read More

View Reddit shared by UserNamesCantBeTooLo

One thought on “Has anyone written a direct response to Jackson Lears’s Russiagate article?

  1. ###Please keep all comments [serious] and on topic according to rule #2. Non-serious comments can be made under this stickied comment, or after the 10/5 requirement.


    **(A)** In order to prevent [FORUM SLIDING]( or [TOPIC DILUTION](, the top 10 comments to any thread must be [serious] and on topic. **(B)** The top 5 child comments to the top 10 comments must abide by the same guideline. **(C)** Non-serious or non-related comments may be posted under the stickied mod comment on the top of any thread, or after the first 10/5. If a mod has not done so yet, please refrain until it is up. [[Serious] Tag Explained]( **(1)** Do not post anything off-topic or any jokes, **(2)** Downvote any comments violating that, and **(3)** Report those comments as well. |

    Please see this thread for more info: [ The Gentleperson’s Guide to Forum Spies and Online Disinformation](


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *